Nov 7, 2011

Commedia dell'arte

Commedia dell'arte





Commedia dell'arte – "comedy of skills": an improvisational style of theater 

When? It began in the 16th century 
Where? Italy
What? Actors worked from a basic outline (plots or "scenarii") and improvised the dialogue. The same stock characters were used and same scenarios (lazzies) 

Some history: 
  • Its origins are unclear, but it is believed that is was influenced by Roman and Greek comedy and medieval traditions 
  • Commedia dell'arte troupes (conformed of 10 to 15 members) traveled with everything they needed, including props, costumes and portable stages to perform outdoors. 
  • Actors wore elaborate half-masks that exaggerated facial features to convey the personality of their character 
  • It influenced writers and performers all over the continent, including Shakespeare and Moliere. 
  • Women for the first time were allowed to perform 
The classic characters:

Il Vecchi 

  • PANTALONE
  • IL DOTTORE
  • IL CAPITANO
*Usually Pantalone and Il Dottore work together (either friends or rivals), while Il Capitano is new in town 

Il Zanni 

  • ARLECCHINO 
  • BRIGHELLA
  • COLOMBINA :  "Little dove". The wise-cracking maid, usually the smartest characters. Flirtatious and playful, she was usually the servant/best-friend/confidante to the leading lady and sometimes Arlecchino's girlfriend. 
Gli Innamorati 

  • The lovers were known by several names: Flavio was popular for a boy and Isabella for a girl 

__________________________________________________________________________________

Colombina 

Costume: dressed in a ragged and patched dress appropriate to a hired servant. Unmasked, but uses heavy make-up around her eyes and always has them wide open. 

Appearance: Strong and attractive like a circus artist or petite and pretty. 


Relationships:  Carries a tambourine which she could use to fend off the amorous advances of Pantalone. She is sometimes Arlecchino's girlfriend. 

Actions: She is often the only functional intellect on stage. She aided her mistress (the innamorata) to gain the affections of her one true love by manipulating Arlecchino and counter-plotting against Pantalone, while managing the whereabouts of the innamorato at the same time. She is a flirtatious and impudent character, but she never looses her judgement 
Poses: 
A variation of the ballet positions with the body either erect or bent.  In Colombina’s case, a great display of cleavege should be incorporated into the poses as often as possible. (Tatiana Marciel)1.)  A cross between laying down and sitting, usually with one knee up and one leg extended flat.
2.)  Hip cocked outward, bust out, and hands extended behind back.
3.)  Leaning forward, hands together with arms extended accenting cleavage with the upper part of the arms.
4.)  Wrapping leg around a male performer.
5.)  Stand upright and "perky" and arms at sides and palms parallel to the ground.
6.)  Profile with weight shifted back on hip with arms folded under cleavage.

Stand: One knee bent, the other leg extended.  Slight forward tilt from the hips to show best features.  Tiny waist and wide hips (Rudlin).

Movements: All zanni movements, in any combination.  Movement continues during speaking, shifting balance from one foot to the other and moving the head sharply as if searching for someone other than the person being addressed.
Fast and nimble in order to escape unwanted attentions or butt in, then escape from a situation (Rudlin).
She is happy and carefree, yet when assigned a task moves with speed and efficency.  This is one of her strongest traits in being a good servant (Shane). 
Voice: Sharp and with pitch variations


Animal: Hawk or dove


Relation to audience: Flirts with them and gets close to them so that they can see her eyes. Strong relationship with the audience, almost confidential– as if she too could see that she is surrounded by fools. 


Personality: She is a woman of the world and understands more about life than the scholar or philosopher.  She is feminine, however it is usually an afterthought as her wit, sarcasm, and strength usually seem masucline in nature (Shane).
Like Il Capitano she is a lone figure, capable of appearing solo.  Often, in fact, the prologue is entrusted to her.  Although capricious and coquettish she is good at her job, careful with money, and will, with great reluctance, make an excellent housekeeper one day.  Although she is very sexually knowing she is sometimes a virgin, when it suits her (Rudlin).


Lazzi: 
1.)  She appears almost if not before her name is called, always being on step ahead of her master.  2.)  She finishes sentences for her master, which she sometimes uses in her favor.
3.)  When a situation gets out of control, she becomes the dominant voice to put everyone and everything back in its place.
4.)  She beats the male characters, sometimes even her master.
5.)  She requests other characters to tell her how important she is.
6.)  She can make her breasts and other parts of her body squeak



"Sitcommedia" 
modern examples of the classic stock character, Columbina:
Amanda from "Ugly Betty, Lilly Truscott from "Hannah Montana", Maddie from "The Suite Life of Zack and Cody"  

References: http://italian.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://shane%2Darts.com/Commedia%2DColumbina.htm
The informational packet gave out in class

Oct 16, 2011

Dramatic monologue

Research 



"A monologue is a predominantly verbal presentation given by a single person featuring a collection of ideas, often loosely assembled around one or more themes. Note that I do not define it as a strictly verbal presentation; many, though certainly not all, successful monologuists also employ nonverbal elements to great effect, such as, their use of facial expressions and hand gestures, along with a variety of props and stage devices."

(Jay Sankey, Zen and the Art of the Monologue. Routledge, 2000)


Dictionary definition 
Mon-o-logue /ˈmänlˌôg/

  1. A long speech by one actor in a play or movie, or as part of a theatrical or broadcast program.
  2. The form or style of such speeches.

Notes on a the article “How to Write an Effective Monologue”

·      Monologues are the lifeblood of characters
·      Monologues transmit whom a character is, what their thought process is and what they plan to do to change their current circumstances.
·      What is a monologue? – Mono means one or single and logue means to speak, or voice.
·      Flowing language is one part of making a monologue effective. Nonetheless, the fluidity of the monologue has to have an emotional stimulus is necessary to avoid the monologue to be flat. Therefore, what is said can flow even if is choppy or even broken. Writing effective monologues does not mean to have grammatically correct sentence. A writer needs to think about how his/her character would speak about a certain situation or topic.
·      The writer should understand the character: its background, age, gender, feelings, relationships, etc.
·      Emotions make the character. Happiness, sadness, fear and anger are the only four emotions that exist. Everything else is an expression of two or more of these four in combination with one another. Understanding this will help the writer know what emotion the character is experiencing and why.



Notes on “Performing Memorable Monologues” by Ratliff and Gerald Lee


·      Cultivate a natural and conversational delivery of dialogue (I will deliver the monologue as a character that has just witnessed a soldier beating a Jewish man. Her speech will flow as if she were expressing her impressions. The highlight of the monologue is that she is traumatized with what she saw and her words are directed the audience in the form of a confession, since the feelings of guilt and impotence dominate her. Thus, the monologue will be played as in naturalistic theater– trying to imitate the real reaction of an adolescent from WWII and staying true to the emotions of human beings).  

·      Display personal habits or mannerisms that distinguish a character (Fidgeting is a habit that the character will develop throughout the monologue to show how she deals with tension).

·       "Tune" the vocal instrument to produce sounds, syllables, and words crisply and focus on the "tempo" that underscores the present moment in the monologue. (Pace is key to the monologue and it will match what is being said. The overall pace will be normal and I will speed it up during the climax to create tension. Pauses will also be used to augment the tension). 



·      The audition wardrobe should be carefully selected to indicate the time period of the script or the character’s mood and attitude. (The attire of my character will reflect that of an adolescent during WWII and will have an element – the star of David patch– that indicates that my character is a Jew during WWII).  


Reflection on creation process

For me process of creation had two stages. First, we were assigned to create a monologue that discussed oppression and, therefore, I chose to talk about WWII, because my grandfather is a survivor of the Jew genocide and I am familiar with the topic. I used his experience as an inspiration for my monologue and when writing it I focused in my style, figurative language and coherence. I thought I had created a strong and effective monologue, but then, after reading the teacher’s comments and researching about how to write effective monologues, I realized that my monologue lacked pace and emotion. My character did not have a voice and my monologue was flat – not only did it lack physicality, but it was also missing the tension I wanted to transmit. Therefore, I read several articles that explained what makes a good monologue and I discovered that movement, as well as voice were key to the success of my performance and that I was lacking both.


         Without a doubt, re-writing my monologue was a challenge. I thought that my monologue was great, but I realized that it was missing essential elements to make it work and transmit a message. Yes, my monologue was good on paper, but it lacked excitement when said out loud. My first step towards re-writing my monologue was to stay away from the paper and simply improvise. This gave me an idea of how my character would move and react to what she had just witnessed. The first thing I did during my improvisation was run. I realized that the preamble of my performance was essential to the creation of the setting and ambiance. At the end, I decided to start the performance by entering the stage running. Additionally, during the improvisation I my expressions came out in an agitated and disordered manner. My first draft was coherent and chronological, but this did not make sense with the traumatized state of my character or with the way in which human beings reconstruct a memory. Thus, I decided to start with the end of the speech to engage the audience and stay true to the emotional response of the character to the horror she previously witnessed. Since my character is not emotionally stable at this moment, her speech cannot be totally coherent or perfect. This is why I included more repetitions and pauses in the second and final draft of my monologue.
         Likewise, the addition of movement helped the monologue come to live. Through improvisation I discovered different ways in which I could transmit tension through physicality. For instance, when I was practicing the climax of the monologue (when she tells the audience how the soldiers tried to cut the man’s beard) I felt that it was lacking emotion and intensity. I began by using my hands as I talked to add tension, but something was still missing. I decided to get a paper that I crumbled as I spoke, but that was not enough. Finally, after playing around with several objects, I decided I needed to break something. I found that a pair of colored pencils would do it, since I could break them in half as a talked and also play with them to show my tension.
         All in all, improvisation and practicing the monologue several times helped me figure out what I needed to modify and how I needed to interpret different moments.

Performance proposal

Through the confessions of a Jew witnessing the horrors of oppression during World War II, the global issue that is discussed through my monologue is peacekeeping and conflict prevention. The Jew adolescent is a by-stander of the harassment the German soldiers inflict on an old Jewish man. The monologue focuses both on her remorse and impotence for not having the courage or ability to prevent the conflict. Likewise, the monologue discusses the violation of human rights through the presentation of the authorities abusing of their power. By contextualizing the monologue in a known historical event– World War II– the audience is able to connect to the story and the character at a deeper level. Immediately, the audience comprehends the magnitude of the conflict presented in the monologue: the discrimination and abuse of the Jews was rooted from hatred and it resulted in genocide.  
            Through the use of movement/physicality, voice and lighting, I will transmit the tension and misery of the character in the monologue.

Movement/physicality

            Although movement is not my focus, it still plays an important role during key moments of the monologue. The agitated entrance of Jozefa, who runs on stage, marks the beginning of the monologue. This first movement sets the tense ambiance and grabs the attention of the audience. Without this initial and simple movement, the monologue would be flat and would lack preamble.
            The physicality of the character revolves around her hands– her tension and restlessness is expressed through the rubbing and fiddling of the hands.  During the climax, what Jozefa does with her hands is key: she fiddles with a pair of colored pencils while she talks about the two soldiers. This action points out her anger and impotence. The action of breaking the pencils in half, expresses her emotional breakdown and her helplessness. Lastly, the fact that she puts her body against the column and presses her face against it, expresses her resignation and despair.

Voice and speech

Voice is key to the feeling I want to transmit through my monologue. Tension will be predominant in the voice of my character to convey the overall tone of the monologue and the ambiance of the war setting.  Jozefa’s voice will be broken, high-pitch and frail to convey her emotional status. Through variations of the tension in my voice, I will stress some words and, in doing so, I will highlight some key moments in the monologue.
The pace at which I will speak will also vary. My monologue will lack smoothness – it will be rather uneven and interrupted by pauses– but it will still have a measured pace and continuity. It is essential for my monologue to have pauses, since this will put emphasis on what I am expressing and will give moments for the audience to digest what is going on. Additionally, pauses create suspense and augment the tension of the scene. The climax of the monologue will have an accelerated pace, which contrasts the medium pace that is predominant throughout it.
Lastly, repetition is key to my monologue. The words I look to emphasize will be repeated so that they stay imbedded in the audience. At the same time, repetition adds to the tension and it is the way in which the audience deals with what is going on.
Lighting
Lights will not vary throughout the performance. The dim lighting will contribute to the gloom mood and the misery of the character. Additionally, the lack of light conveys hopelessness and the war setting.
Sound
            The soundtrack from “Schindler’s List”, Jewish Town (Krakow Ghetto-Winter 41), will be used to contribute to the solemnity of the monologue. Likewise, it will augment the tension of the situation. The instrumental song will not be played from the beginning of the monologue, because at first I want the audience to focus on the movement of the character and the tone of her voice.
Link to the soundtrack: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yBba30y4Vc&feature=related (played from minute 1:24)
It was a challenge to find a soundtrack that suited the mood and ambiance of the monologue. The song should not be the protagonist of the performance, but it should contribute to the development of it. After discarding several soundtracks, I found this one. I believe that it does not only express somberness, but it also helps create the desired tension. 


Costume

            Costume is important to my performance, since it will contribute to the ambiance and characterization of Jozefa. The character that I will be interpreting is based on the figure of a historical character from World War II. She is a Jewish during the time of Hitler's domain and, therefore, her attire should resemble a girl living during the time when Jews were discriminated in Poland. The key element of her outfit will be the patch that the Germans forced the Jewish to wear when they were in street as a way of identifying them. The patch went either on the arm or the chest– I chose the chest for this particular performance so that it is more visible. 


Then, I also researched the type of clothing that a girl would've worn and I found references that indicated that the typical attire would include a coat and a dress or some kind of formal outfit. 





The following is a picture of my attire: 
(to be added) 


Stage

            I will only use one element on stage: a black rectangle box that will act as a column. This will be used at the end of the monologue for the character to lean on as a sign of defeat and complete despair. Other than that no other elements are needed to create the setting. The dim lighting and the soundtrack will create the ambiance of a war setting and the solemn mood. 



The monologue 

Jozefa enters the stage running.
She is breathing heavily, trembling and on the verge of tears.

JOZEFA: He had him under his boot; the German soldier had. He had him under his boot and was pressing his chest against the pavement. He was pressing and pressing and pressing.

And I did nothing to help. Nothing. 

It’s been twenty days now since the Germans attacked Poland. The tension created by this uncertain war is tangible. Bombs invade the blue skies every now and then. We are not save anymore. The Germans have invaded our streets, our thoughts, our rights – we belong to them.

That poor man, that poor, poor man, he just one of the victims. I fear it’s a matter of time before they get hold of me, of my family. If you could have seen the look in the soldiers’ eyes as he was pushing and hitting the old man. It was hatred, the kind of hatred that contaminates the air and suffocates anyone watching.

I was on my way to visit my grandfather when I saw them.

[Takes out two colored pencils from her pocket and fiddles with them while she speaks]

There were two of them, two German soldiers – one soldier attacked, the other laughed. [Pause] He laughed.
The soldier was yanking the man by his white beard. He threw him to the floor. He spit on him. He hit him. He spit again. They were having fun; amusing themselves with the suffering of the man.

And I stood there paralyzed. I did nothing. I stood there while the soldier tried to cut the man’s beard with a bayonet. The man squealed. But the soldier still moved the bayonet back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. The man squealed. The soldier laughed. And he kept going back and forth, back and forth.
[She breaks the pencils in half]
[Pause]
The thing is, you cannot cut a beard with a bayonet.
[Pause]
He had him under his boot; the German soldier had. [She leans against the black rectangle that acts as a column and slides down as she speaks] He had him under his boot and was pressing his chest against the pavement. He was pressing and pressing and pressing. [She presses her face against the column as she says the former line] And I did nothing to help. Nothing. 
I can only think and I shiver at the thought: that old man could have been my grandfather. But I still did nothing to help. Nothing.


The Performance I - Class presentation


The performance in front of the class was not what I had expected. Although I had practiced before, several factors altered the quality of my presentation. I became overly nervous for no apparent reason rather than the fact that I had to expose my art. I believe that when performing one should always experience some type of uncontrollable emotion – either nervousness or excitement in order to maintain you alert and lively. Even more, when one is presenting an intimate piece of work, written by one, one becomes more self-conscious and aware. In the case of this performance, I was presenting a monologue I had written and directed by myself; thus, every element in the performance depended on me. Even though I felt confident about the work I had prepared, nerves got hold of me. 
The drama classroom was dark, expect for the back of the room that had been arranged to serve as the stage in which I had performed numerous times before. I experienced a déjà vu: my mind travelled back almost a year when I had also performed a piece of my own, which I had titled "Waiting". The lighting has also been dim and my senses as alert. I tried to focus, but my mind drifted off to different locations and times. (This often happens to me– when I'm about to perform, my mind wanders to places I had not visited for a long time). Eventually, I returned from my distant thoughts to the stage in which I had to perform my monologue. I became immersed in the emotions I had to portray: despair and anxiety. 
I entered the stage running, as planned, and I planted myself in front of the audience. The words, I had practiced several times before (and written, too), began coming out of my lips. I had told a classmate to press play when I gave the cue so that background music would create the mood I wanted to portray along with my acting and stage setting. The music came out too loud and my mind flashed to a menacing thought: I should've tested the sound before. You always have to do a sound check. What was I thinking? I became silent for a split second that felt like an hour; I had forgotten my next line. What was it? They won't hear me because of the music. Raise your voice. But this will affect my acting... still; I have to raise my voice. I made a dramatic pause– my gestures did not reveal that I had forgotten everything. Improvisation came in handy. I motioned my classmate to lower the volume. I should not have done that! Whatever happens the actor must continue and not engage in any technical problem. I reincorporated myself. I used emotion to disguise the mistake and then the lines came back to me. I was in the last part of the monologue and, suddenly, it was over. 
Now that I reflect back I did overcome the issue with improvisation and experience– I had been there before, that moment when your mind goes blank, but still, it is frightening every time. As a detestable perfectionist I am, I was very unsatisfied with my performance and still am. I knew I could have done better. And I do not blame the technical problem completely; I should have been prepared for the worst, one should always be. Unexpected things are bound to happen during a performance and it is the skill of the performer that should counteract it. For the audience the mistake was not huge, I reacted accordingly so that they would not notice, but I felt it ruined my performance. I could have reacted with more expertise: I should have continued when the music was too loud and I should have stayed in character (one should always stay in character, regardless of what is happening around you). 
Nonetheless, I do feel I was able to transmit emotion and the core message of the performance, the suffering of my character due to the violation of human rights. I think that the internal conflict of my character was successfully portrayed; the audience was aware of who my character was in a historical, social and personal context. Still, some important parts in the monologue were hindered by the lines I missed and the moment in which I became detached from my character. For my next performance I will remember to always stay in character and to prepare for the unexpected. I believe that to do so, I should feel more comfortable with improvisation and with my character. One of my weaknesses in theater is that I still do not feel quite at ease with mistakes and improvising to counteract them. I do it, yes, but I have to work on doing it without feeling as a failure afterwards. After all, unpredicted factors will always show up and my duty is to work with them and enjoy it. 

The performance II- GIN presentation
  

Oct 4, 2011

Improvisation Unit

Improv !





Improvisation appears before my terrified eyes as an indomitable lion, an unpredictable beast that threatens to swallow me. I am defenseless upfront this spontaneous creature from which I do not know what to expect. Although the stage has always been my confront zone and acting my means for expression and a catharsis, I find improvisation rather challenging for me. I believe we share a love-hate relationship – I its admire messy beauty and daring nature, but it keeps trying to bite me. I want to tame this beast known as improvisation, but I know that this will not be an easy task. 

The word "Improv!" welcomes care-free smiles and daring looks; everyone wants to be a part of this "fun game that does not require much work or craft". Yet, when confronted with improvisation most fail. Since the day in which I was introduced to Improvisation (I capitalize the word because I feel this form of theater is a complex creature, rather than a form of art) I have been intrigued by what it takes to tame it. And I secretly admire those who have the abilities to do so. 

I have discovered, over the years, that my main fear is to make mistakes. This is a fear that society inculcates in us; mainly schools, which dictate that it is atrocious to be mistaken. But improvisation requires you to make mistakes, because it requires you to try.  Failure is inherent in trying; when attempting to do something you are bound make mistakes. This does not mean that the process of trying is only making mistakes, but accepting mistakes propels success. Thus, improvising requires you to"let go" of everything and respond to what is given to you, without the fear of failure. This is why I have a hard time giving in; I am afraid to fail. This blocks my imagination and instinct to react to what is given to me. 

One of my personal goals is to improve my improvisation skill. More than an objective for me as an artist/ aspiring actress, taming improvisation is something I want to achieve for me as an individual. I consider it more a challenge for me as a person, than a challenge of technique. Mastering improvisation would mean that I would become less self-conscious and accepting of mistakes, which, ultimately, result on success.  

Sep 27, 2011

Journal on our vision project on "Lysistrata"

27 Sept. 2011

An insight on the intended outcome and the process of creation

In theater, having a vision is fundamental for the development of any type of performance since it is the “vehicle” that will guide your process of creation. Thus, the vision is what a director starts with– the vision is the intangible interpretation a director has of the play, which will then take a concrete form. Yet, without this initial idea or ‘formless hunch’, the creative process lacks direction.
The stimulus we were given to create a vision from was the last part of the last scene of Aristophanes’ “Lysistrata”, Myrrhine’s seduction. The challenge of the given task consisted on making this part of Aristophanes’ play our own by developing a unique vision that would communicate something relevant to us. This was not an easy task, because we already knew the playwright’s vision and that of many directors that had already staged “Lysistrata”. So this in some sense blocked us at first; we had to think of something that would give a twist and new meaning to the traditional versions. Subsequently, we decided to present a vision that would make sense to us in our own historical/cultural context. In that way we would be able to explore the scene from a personal perspective and comprehend it more in-depth. I believe that it is key to be able to connect with any piece you are creating, either from a personal, cultural or social stand. Henceforth, we changed the style of the piece from a theatrical performance to a film version and the historical context of the play from a war in Greece to a war in Peru.

“Lysistrata” was originally performed in Athens in 411 B.C. Although the themes presented were vanguard for the time and are still current, the setting and general context of the play is distant from us. Despite the fact that the war between Sparta and Athens is relevant to our education, it has no real value in our cultural and historical context – we have no emotional attachment to that war. On the other hand, the war between Peru and Chile, from the late 19th century, has more importance to us; it happened in the country we were born in (or reside in, in Pedro’s case) not in a remote land we have never been to. This is why we chose to situate our version of “Lysistrata” in Peru. This is more relevant to our reality and, thus, not only can we relate more in-depth to it, but also can the audience. Through the change of the historical background I discovered the richness of the themes that Aristophanes portrays through his play; these are universal and timeless themes. This shows how theater around the world can influence us and relate to us, despite of the different historical periods. Sex and the inequality of the sexes is still a controversial topic nowadays. Although we have made significant advances with women rights, Peru is still a patriarchal society to some extend, especially in provinces. Therefore, it was suitable to transport “Lysistrata” to a ‘modern’ version, called “Maria” in Tacna, Peru The setting changed and the Greek names of the characters were replaced by typical Peruvian names; yet the essence of the play remained.

Our overall idea was to stay true to the core meaning of the play, but to give it our signature. I believe that we achieved this by making our version socially and historically relevant to us. We took advantage of what we had learned about Aristotle’s poetics to highlight what we were looking to express. Foremost we aimed to communicate what we considered the most important theme of the play to us – how women can manipulate men through their understanding of their sensuality and power. To do so we decided to tone down the sexual allusions and the explicit presentations of sex in the play. While versions of “Lysistrata” use elements as nudity and elongated penises to highlight the power of sex, our version aimed to accentuate the power of women instead. Our version puts emphasis on the verbal and physical actions of the Maria (Lysistrata) that made her intellectually superior. Both her eloquent speech and her physicality portrayed her strength, in contrast to the vulnerability of men, shown through their brief and chopped speech as well as their drooped appearance. So, in our version sexuality was simply a tool that women took advantage of because they understood the power they could have by using it.

Additionally, we wanted to keep it a satire that ridiculed men and their ironic debility for women. The scene we were given particularly showed this contrast between men and women – Lysistrata was in control of the Spartans and Athenians. We put emphasis on this by highlighting the “climax” of our scene. To decide what the climax of our scene was we broke it up using Aristotle’s poetics; this was helpful to decide which sections of our scene were the most relevant to our vision. Definitely, the turning point of the scene (when Peace enters naked and both troops obey Lysistrata) communicated the theme we were looking to portray the best. The link below is a referential video I used to help develop my vision of this key scene. The video shows the entrance of Peace as prominent happening – here they use lighting and levels to show it. Using this this video as a guide I proposed to include a sense of suspense and importance to this part of the scene.  In this version they do it through the flicking of lights and the descend of the actress interpreting Peace. We used the same idea of creating tension, by proposing that Paz (Peace) enters with a transparent tunic – to generate expectancy and intrigue– and that then she takes it off slowing, revealing only parts of her body to the audience who understand that she is naked by the facial expressions of the men. 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSBnzwwZ4-g

Another decision we made was to make our version a film version. After the presentation I noticed that this was not the most optimal choice, because this is a theater arts course after all. Nonetheless, our vision could still suit a theatrical performance. I will still discuss why we chose to adapt “Lysistrata” into a hypothetical movie to defend our decision, although I realize now that it was not necessary to make a film version. Going with our desire to make it our own and to modernize it we chose to shape our vision into a movie. Nowadays movies are more popular than theatrical performance and, therefore, our intention was to make it as appealing to the audience as possible. Also, we wanted to take advantage of the close-ups that can be used with film. Since we wanted to show sensuality, instead of sexuality and provide the audience with a less explicit ‘performance’, we decided to use close-ups to insinuate elements as Peace’s nudity by showing only some body parts and the expressions of the men.

A reflection on working as team

            It was challenging to work with a group in creating a vision, because we all had different ideas and readings of the play and our scene. For me theater is a very intimate process at first. Even though I know that ensemble work is key to the success of a production, when I create a vision I prefer to start on my own and then get together with the rest in my group. This is because I first have to explore what I understand from the scene or performance. Usually when I have to create a vision, I first start with incoherent and elusive ideas that I have to make sense of on my own, to then share them. I get like images in my head of colors, setting and movements that would fit with the given stimulus or scene, but at first they only make sense to me. Although this task was straightforward in comparison to other processes of creation in which one is given a broad incentive to work from, it was difficult for me to get a clear vision without experiencing the internal process of chaos first.
            Still, I think that overall we were able to combine our personal vision on this last scene to create a vision that made sense to whole group. 




Video of the presentation:




Sep 14, 2011

Class notes

Class notes 
08 Aug. 2011
Greek theater 

Dionysus: the god of whine and drama.

Greek mythology --> theater plays were stories rooted in truth. 

500 B.C - Tragedy 
200 years later comedy was born 

Aristotle's poetics 

Definition according to him: 
"(...) imitation of an action that is serious, complete and of a certain magnitude; in language embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, the several kinds being found in separate parts of the play; in the form of action, not narrative (...)" 

For him, the most important genre was tragedy, since it was a catharsis. 

The Poetics
Imitation of action (mimesis)according to "the law of probability or necessity"
It's about the drama (not the narrative) 
History (specific) versus Drama (universal)

Six parts of tragedy:
Plot
Characters
Diction
Thoughts
Spectacle 
Melody 

Plot was the most important element in a play, according to Aristotle. 
-first principle
-the arrangement 
-a whole
-beginning, middle and end

Image 1. Perfect plot 

Example, 
        he believed that "Oedipus, the king" (Sofocles) was a perfect tragedy. 
Class notes
12 September 2011

Dramaturgy 101

Dramaturgy 101
Study of the play from a literary and performance point of view à social, political, cultural and historical contexts of play’s world.
“Multidimensional understanding”
Share what he/she learns
“Historical, critical, literacy and philosophical consciousness”
A dramaturg is a “watchdog” or “keeper of the text”, according to Proehl
The phrase that describes the work of a dramaturge, according to Bly, is “I question.”
Learns about a play’s text and its context.
Having a set procedure to follow is helpful and essential for beginners in the process of dramaturgy
Having a set procedure to follow is helpful and essential for beginners in the process of dramaturgy
Pre-production preparation à since the director has a particular view on the play and its world, it is vital for the dramaturg to “support and illuminate this vision through research and participation in the rehearsal process”
Tips:
  1. Do initial readings à analysis of the text to obtain its essence and what needs to be researched.
  2. Create a glossary à find key, intricate or confusing words to have them as a guide to start researching.
  3. Research the background of the play à the historical period in which the play is set to communicate the pertinent societal concerns of people living in that era and place. The historical background is important because it provides the actors and the production with a context for the world.
  4. Review materials that reflect the world of the play à examples are the art, music and customs of the time. Music and images that convey the mood and theme of the play. Maps, photographs, video, magazines, etc.
  5. Organize your research for presentation à it is important to be concise, direct and to narrow down your research to note the most significant and relevant parts of the investigation that will contribute to the understanding and development of the play.

Response to text read:
After reading this article I became aware that the dramaturg’s role is vital to the creation of a play. It is his/ her job to inform the director, actors and production about the historical background of the play, what elements of the play represent, such as silence in “Waiting for Godot” and how the character are influenced by the time period. The job of a dramaturg is to question the text and interpret through a historical, philosophical and social scope. Although they should not intervene in the vision of the director or tell the actors what to do, he/she explains the why behind a scene, a phrase and the setting of the play. Context is relevant in anything we do and most of all in theater because it provides the actors and audience with a comprehension of space, a mood and an overall tone of the scenes. Context sets you in a place, time and moment. Without it one cannot develop a character in depth, because the actor would lack the awareness of their space and the world they live in. Setting and important facts of the time (including culture, society and politics) provide actors with material to enrich their interpretation. When they understand where they come from and where they are, they can create a sense of where they are going and why they are there.
     Without a doubt, dramaturgs are an essential piece in a play, since they provide the actors, director and production with valuable information that they can use to create. The creation process is not possible without material to work with. What dramaturgs give is the raw material that the directors mold and forge into the product.

Quotes about dramaturgy:

"In short, the Dramaturg is primarily
responsible for the dramatic and literary, as opposed to the
theatrical aspects of the theatre."
DRAMATURGY AND THE TEXT: "There used to be a time, as with the
Sacred, when we could go back to the Book and check our interpre-
tation.  The Text was the inseminating source to which we were to show fidelity, line perfect, deferring to the Author as if he
were God the Father."

 "I believe that the basic requirement for all rehearsal work (...) is primarily a kind of doubting process . . . a doubting and questioning of the theatrical means and also of the traditional themes."

DRAMATURGY AND LOVE: "A script comes in at my theatre, and I'm
the first one who is apt to fall in love with it. . . .  [S]ometimes there's no director for that play yet.  Okay now, I may not choose the director, but the fact is, once it goes into production I have had the longest relationship with that play of anybody at that theatre."